![]() |
What Are the Ages of Trees in Your Neighborhood? |
| [ comment ] | [ email article ] | [ print article ] | [ rss feed ] |
by John Dwyer
Research Associate
The Morton Arboretum
Trees are often a distinctive feature of the urban landscape. Large trees are especially prominent, have a particularly significant influence on the urban landscape and symbolize permanence amid change.
We are curious about the age of these venerable giants as an indication of the history they have witnessed. Their ages also offer a clue to their significance by indicating how long we might have to wait for a replacement tree to reach their size.
To get some indication of the age of urban trees, Kerstin Von der Heide, Forester, Village of Downers Grove, Illinois measured tree diameters (4.5 feet above the ground) and counted the number of annual rings on the stumps of 328 trees representing 24 species removed from along village streets. The oldest was a 167-year-old white oak that measured 26.2 inches in diameter. All trees older than 135 years were white oak or burr oak. The largest tree measured was a 52.2-inch American elm 110 years old. Other trees over 40 inches in diameter were willow, green ash or honeylocust.
Following a study of forest-grown tree ages by Marlin Bowles and Michael Jones from The Morton Arboretum, I used a similar statistical approach to estimate the ages of urban trees at specified diameters for each of 12 species for which sufficient data were available. Limited observations restricted the ages for which results could be reported. The resulting estimates
presented in the Table (below) are only approximations because there is a wide range of growth rates for individual urban street trees (even within a particular species), type of location (along streets), and village.
Other studies of the growth of street trees have shown considerable variation in tree size at a given age based on the condition of the tree and the environment in which it is growing. In addition, results may not be directly applicable to trees growing in other types of urban locations. For example, a tree growing unrestricted above and below ground in the middle of a large yard with good soil conditions may grow at a faster rate than trees along street corridors, consequently the yard tree may reach a given diameter in fewer years than a typical street tree.
A striking contrast between the urban trees studied here and forest grown trees studied by Bowles and Jones is that forest trees may be up to 80% older than urban trees at a particular size. These slower growth rates are probably caused by reduced available light and in some instances greater competition for soil resources under a forest tree canopy.
If you know the tree species and can find it in the Table (below). All you need is the tree diameter in inches measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. Then look up the estimated age. It is usually easier to
measure tree circumference than diameter, and diameter in inches can be calculated from circumference by dividing circumference in inches by 3.1415. If you do not have a measuring tape, you can put a string around the tree and then measure the string with a ruler. Because of the different growth rates of forest and urban trees, it is important to use the report by Bowles and Jones for estimating the ages of trees growing in forest conditions.
Many of the larger trees are most likely older than the residential developments in which they are found. Others may have been planted when the streets were established, the homes built or at other times.
| SHARE ON... |



August 15th, 2009 at 8:25 am
Hi There,
Just wanted to know how to find the Table mentioned in the above article. It will be fun to get estimates of trees im my yard/neighborhood since I live in northern Glen Ellyn and am certain that many are over 100 years old.
Great article! Thanks for all that you do!
Joe Clark
August 15th, 2009 at 8:29 am
Great article, but where is the said table? I’d love to see it.
August 15th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Had some trouble getting it posted. Will try to have it live by end of today (Saturday). Please check back – it’s worth it! – KLJ
Just posted a version of the table. 3:30 p.m. 8/15
August 16th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
When we moved into Oak Hill in 1981 the neighbors hired one of the doctors from the Arboretum to look at all the trees. He said our Burr Oak was 200+ at that time. We have a great mixture of trees, from the small ones that the Village planted on the tree lawn to the huge elms, lindens and of course, oaks.
August 17th, 2009 at 9:51 am
Greetings from Kentucky,
We love your newsletter and get lots of good ideas for our budding nature center at Lost River Cave & Valley in Bowling Green.
Could you please share the table with us for our fall newsletter. It will be greatly appreciated.
Email mail it to rho@lostrivercave.com
Thank you, Rho
August 18th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Some of the largest trees I see around neighborhoods are cotton woods. Do you have any data about how to estimate the age of cotton woods?
August 21st, 2009 at 10:36 am
Rich
There are three cottonwood trees in our data. The diameters and ages are as follows:
21.3 inches and 38 years
24.5 inches and 40 years
29.5 inches and 77 years
This suggests that cottonwood grows as fast as the fastest growing trees in the table, Siberian Elm and American Elm.
I do not have any other information on the growth of cottonwoods available to me at this time
John Dwyer
Research Associate
Morton Arboretum
August 25th, 2009 at 11:42 am
To Rho Lansden from John Dwyer
Go ahead and use the table from the article on Tree Talk in your newsletter. Please cite the source and please encourage your readers to check Tree Talk for other items that may be of interest to them.
I am glad that you found the information useful. Feel free to contact me directly if I can be of help to you.
take care
John Dwyer
January 3rd, 2010 at 12:16 pm
Went outside to hang up flag on the White Ash in the front yard. Circumference at 4″ from ground was 134″ (Using, as suggested, a string and then measuring the string). This appears to be a number NOT on the chart. Any help? The tree would make a lot of Louisville Slugger baseball bats, methinks.
January 6th, 2010 at 3:23 pm
John
You report a white ash tree that measures 134” in circumference. Your message indicates that it was measured 4” above the ground. We measure trees 4.5’ above the ground and that is what the table is based on. But if you meant 4’ above the ground we can take it as an approximation of tree diameter. It would translate into nearly 43 inches which is a very large ash tree.
We did not have many measurements of white ash trees, so they are not included in the table. The measurements that we do have are not that different from those for green ash trees, so I think that you could use the table for green ash trees to estimate the age of your tree. It might be approaching 150 years of age, and I expect that it is not less than 120 years of age.
It certainly sounds like an old and venerable giant, and I suspect that it is one of the largest in your neighborhood.
John Dwyer
January 22nd, 2010 at 12:12 pm
1-22-10
Hello
I’m a treekeeper(#623) with the Openlands
Project.The age of trees sounds like a
fun project for treehuggers to get involved in. I would be interested in
learning more and volunteering my time
in what I believe is dendrochronology.
Anybody else? My phone # 708-456-5920
or e-mail rjglowski@mac.com
Have a good day
Richard Glogowski